Scott, I feel honored that you place me above you in the "sick, twisted, and demented" categories. So, am I in first place, or do I have competition?
Mini, we can remember all we want, but my take is that Busch can sponsor Casting Kids too. As a matter of fact, I'd rather they sponsor Casting Kids than the Classic anyway. Let's see, Casting Kids is completely selfless, it's about getting kids interested in fishing, taking them fishing, and having flip, pitch, and cast competitions (at least that's what we did last year). Bass Pro Shops hosted the event in DFW, donated some tackle and bait, and I'm assuming some (or all) of the prizes. This was truly a "give back to the community" affair. We took nothing of monetary value from this event.
The idea that Busch donating money to help teach children about the outdoors, outdoor conservation, etc is wrong, well, the idea is wrong! As far as I'm concerned, NAMBLA could donate money to it. As long as they (any group or company) isn't pushing an illegal product (and beer for children IS illegal), let 'em donate.
Just because you don't AGREE with a legal product, doesn't mean that company can do no good.
(As for the comment about Casting Kids vs the Classic, the Classic is for profit of the anglers.)
If you want to try to dictate a sponsor's name or logo not appearing, that's fine. However, in Toxic's situation, I'd gladly take their money -- again, if I chose not to allow their advertising, they'd probably pull the sponsorship but their MONEY is good with me.