Scott Hammer TOXIC
Well-Known Member
What would you do?
I have 2 options for my upcoming trip to Wisconsin. I can go the shortest route which is north to PA then due west and back north at Chicago. Or...I can go what I call the "Southern" route which adds about an hour and a half to the trip (will be staying in Chicago with relatives, actually Inverness, the first night).
Pro's and cons.....Southern route is less conjested, no turnpikes, 1 stretch of toll road, cheaper gas (not forced into using the turnpike gas stations) but it is longer and the mountains in Kentucky are a B!TCH.
Northern route is faster but there are the tolls, turnpikes, heavier traffic, bigger cities to navigate and there is getting through Chicago. I have thought about leaving at about 3am to ease the traffic. My big concern is that if there is a wreck on any one of those awful turnpikes then you could sit for a looooong time.
Which way would you go and why? I've done both.
TOXIC
I have 2 options for my upcoming trip to Wisconsin. I can go the shortest route which is north to PA then due west and back north at Chicago. Or...I can go what I call the "Southern" route which adds about an hour and a half to the trip (will be staying in Chicago with relatives, actually Inverness, the first night).
Pro's and cons.....Southern route is less conjested, no turnpikes, 1 stretch of toll road, cheaper gas (not forced into using the turnpike gas stations) but it is longer and the mountains in Kentucky are a B!TCH.
Northern route is faster but there are the tolls, turnpikes, heavier traffic, bigger cities to navigate and there is getting through Chicago. I have thought about leaving at about 3am to ease the traffic. My big concern is that if there is a wreck on any one of those awful turnpikes then you could sit for a looooong time.
Which way would you go and why? I've done both.
TOXIC