clean boat act

Nitro Owners Forum

Help Support Nitro Owners Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Ed Slowinski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
64
Reaction score
0


What people need to understand is that if the new version of the bill is not passed ALL BOATERS will have to buy an EPA permit that could cost $800.00 or more. The EPA does not have a choice. As the law is written right now they MUST create a permitting system for ALL boats by September of this year. Obviously this will cripple the boating industry as well as recreation. Time is running out!



Watch the video:



http://www.boattest.com/nmma.aspx



Contact your members of congress:



http://www.rallycongress.com/boattest-dotcom/1064



 
Here is a link I came accross when doing some research about this topic.

http://forums.boatingmag.com/boating/board/message?board.id=8&thread.id=115

Looks like recreational boats are already exempt, now they are working on a

bill to exempt chartered boats. It's still a good idea to contact your

congressman about this.
 
I read somewhere that rec. boaters are exempt,..and more than likely charter boats will be too. This law was written as an attempt to keep foreign freighters from pumping/emptying/draining their bilges into US waters, in an effort to curtail the introduction of even MORE non-native exotic species and weeds.



Personally, I'd be more concerned over $4.00/gal gas prices, which WILL affect EVERY boater!!:huh::eek:

 
here's the answer Sen Dustbin....



It is informative







Dear Mr. Meyer:



Thank you for contacting me with your concerns about proposed regulatory changes that may impact recreational boating. I appreciate hearing from you.



In September 2006, a California District Court ruled that boats were subject to regulation for the incidental discharge of pollutants under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Under Section 404, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) operates a system of discharge permits known as the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). In the past, the EPA applied NPDES regulations to land-based sources of water pollution, such as sewage treatment plants and industrial facilities, but exempted commercial and recreational vessels from the permit process.



The suit that led to the ruling dealt specifically with the discharge of ballast water by commercial ships. Commercial vessels often take on significant amounts of water for the purpose of maintaining stability. This ballast water, which is pumped out of the ship during its voyage or at its destination, can contain exotic species that drive out native wildlife and upset the natural balance of a local ecosystem. The EPA estimates that 30 percent of invasive species have been introduced in the Great Lakes through ballast water. For example, the release of ballast water is thought to be responsible for the local invasion of zebra mussels.



The court's ruling extended NPDES regulations more broadly to all vessels and any incidental discharge of pollutants. The EPA has expressed concern over the court's decision, citing serious obstacles to monitoring and enforcing these newly applied regulations. One potential problem raised by the agency is that NPDES permit requirements differ from state to state. Many boaters travel in waters off the coasts of multiple states and would be forced to apply for multiple discharge permits.



We should address the issue of ballast water and the introduction of aquatic invasive species. Any new regulations, however, should seek to avoid any unfair or unnecessary burdens on recreational boaters.



The Clean Boating Act of 2008 (S. 2766) would exempt recreational vessels, including charter boats, from the requirements of the NPDES permit process. In addition, the measure lays out a three-year framework to determine if discharge management practices should be required of recreational boats.



The Clean Boating Act has been referred to the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. I am not a member of this committee, but I will keep your support for S. 2766 in mind in case the bill is brought to the Senate floor for a vote.



Thank you again for contacting me. Please feel free to keep in touch.



Sincerely,

Richard J. Durbin

United States Senator

 
I thought this was going to be another ad for Bass Boat Saver (BBS). :lol::lol::lol:



On the serious side of things - I've been keeping track of this as well.



All the best,

Glenn
 

Latest posts

Back
Top