Jim Corson
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2003
- Messages
- 174
- Reaction score
- 0
I just feel like i need to vent, as i just read an article stating that the 4 suspects that killed Sean Taylor were charged with "UNPREMEDITATED MURDER". It also stated that the 4 suspects, never had any intention of killing anyone. Heres where i disagree, and this is a direct quote from NESN. (Miami-Dade County police Director Robert Parker said the suspects didn't expect Taylor to be home when they broke in early Monday, but the Redskins safety was recuperating from a knee injury and had returned from Washington. When Taylor surprised them, he was shot.
"They were certainly not looking to go there and kill anyone," Parker said. "They were expecting a residence that was not occupied. (IF THEY WERE EXPECTING THE RESIDENCE TO BE UNOCCUPIED, WHY WOULD THEY BRING A GUN?) So murder or shooting someone was not their initial motive.") Sorry but, IMO, if they had no intent on shooting anyone, why'd they have a gun? All 4 had prior arrest records as well. I disagree with unpremeditated murder, as they knew exactly what they were doing, and were armed for any confrontations they would encounter. Hope i'm not being to judgemental, but they deserve the maximum sentence. You do the crime, you do the time. Jim
"They were certainly not looking to go there and kill anyone," Parker said. "They were expecting a residence that was not occupied. (IF THEY WERE EXPECTING THE RESIDENCE TO BE UNOCCUPIED, WHY WOULD THEY BRING A GUN?) So murder or shooting someone was not their initial motive.") Sorry but, IMO, if they had no intent on shooting anyone, why'd they have a gun? All 4 had prior arrest records as well. I disagree with unpremeditated murder, as they knew exactly what they were doing, and were armed for any confrontations they would encounter. Hope i'm not being to judgemental, but they deserve the maximum sentence. You do the crime, you do the time. Jim