George Arbuckle
Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2012
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 0
So I'm getting ready to pull the trigger on a 4 inch jack plate for my 1994 160TF that has a 40 hp Mercury 4 cylinder. The reason that I'm even bothering with such a modification on this small motor is because it actually runs real well. Boat goes 30 mph on GPS at 5500 rpm with a 12p Stiletto stainless prop, two passengers, and gear.
After reading all the posts on here about jack plates and engine height, I measured mine and was surprised to find that I'm a full 7.5 inches below the pad. Despite this, the hole shot is real good which I attribute to the help of a Stingray Hydrofoil. Being someone who can't leave well enough alone, I know there are improvements that can be made here, but, the question is how much? In my opinion, this set up is already performing beyond what I think it should. Can setting the height closer to the standard 3.5 inch make a noticeable difference at these lower speeds?
I suppose ultimately, my goal would be to set a good height, loose the hydrofoil, maintain the good hole shot, and pick up a few mph. Do we think this is realistic?
Thanks for your input.
George.
After reading all the posts on here about jack plates and engine height, I measured mine and was surprised to find that I'm a full 7.5 inches below the pad. Despite this, the hole shot is real good which I attribute to the help of a Stingray Hydrofoil. Being someone who can't leave well enough alone, I know there are improvements that can be made here, but, the question is how much? In my opinion, this set up is already performing beyond what I think it should. Can setting the height closer to the standard 3.5 inch make a noticeable difference at these lower speeds?
I suppose ultimately, my goal would be to set a good height, loose the hydrofoil, maintain the good hole shot, and pick up a few mph. Do we think this is realistic?
Thanks for your input.
George.