Rich D
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2001
- Messages
- 2,555
- Reaction score
- 0
I was on a muskie board and saw a post from a guy looking for a recipe to cook a 50" he caught. Now I suspect this was a troll post, looking to stir things up, successfully I might add, but it got me to thinking...
Most fishermen/women I know practice catch and release and especially with graphite reproductions, more and more trophies are released. I believe in this practice as well, occasionally keeping some smaller fish for the table. Especially when you think of the years it takes for a fish to reach trophy proportions, this makes more sense.
However, why is this theory not popular with the hunting crowd. Most deer hunters I know are looking for that trophy rack. Wouldn't it make more sense to have a camera with us in the stand and when that trophy buck appears, shoot a couple pictures for the wall and shoot a smaller, younger (tastier) deer for meat? To me it makes sense to leave the trophy out there to pass on his genes.
For the record, when I do hunt, I hunt for meat and shoot the first deer I can, buck or doe, large or small rack.
What are your opinions?
Rich D
Most fishermen/women I know practice catch and release and especially with graphite reproductions, more and more trophies are released. I believe in this practice as well, occasionally keeping some smaller fish for the table. Especially when you think of the years it takes for a fish to reach trophy proportions, this makes more sense.
However, why is this theory not popular with the hunting crowd. Most deer hunters I know are looking for that trophy rack. Wouldn't it make more sense to have a camera with us in the stand and when that trophy buck appears, shoot a couple pictures for the wall and shoot a smaller, younger (tastier) deer for meat? To me it makes sense to leave the trophy out there to pass on his genes.
For the record, when I do hunt, I hunt for meat and shoot the first deer I can, buck or doe, large or small rack.
What are your opinions?
Rich D